So, let’s say you’re considering an electric car
but you don’t know what living with one might be like or what you might need to keep it charged up.
You’ve landed on the right video!
I’ll be covering the ins-and-outs of living with and charging EVs in 2022,
from what chargers are out there for home use,
how to choose the right one based on your needs, vehicle, and situation,
what traveling long-distance is like now and what needs to be improved,
and what hiccups to look out for particularly in cold weather.
This will be a largely US-centric conversation, especially when we talk about stuff like volts, amps, and
miles... per gallon... of gasoline,
but the broad strokes apply no matter where you are.
My goal here is for you to have a fairly complete understanding of electric cars
so you can make the most educated and rational choices for your personal needs.
Before we get started, you’ve probably already noticed that this video is…
quite long.
I want this video to answer as many questions and concerns as someone entirely unfamiliar with electric cars might have,
and all in one place.
So there’s a lot of information here.
Chapter markers are there to help you move around.
But I want to stress that in day-to-day life, I’m not thinking about any of this stuff!
I simply plug in my car and walk away, and in the morning it’s full again.
Although it takes my car several hours to charge,
I spend seconds plugging it in and it charges while I'm asleep.
That means I actually spend much less time refueling compared to negotiating a gas pump transaction every week or two.
I can tell you with absolute certainty that I would never go back to a gas-powered car.
An EV is simply much more convenient and easier to live with when you can charge it at home.
And I know not everyone can do that right now.
That’s something we need to work on.
But if you can, here’s the situation in a nutshell:
If you drive the typical average distance daily, a regular household outlet might actually meet your needs.
And if you need or want a little more power, don’t assume you’ll need an electrical service upgrade;
a basic 20A 240V circuit can easily cover very long commute distances
- up to 100 miles - every day, charging only overnight.
And any car can plug into any charger of any capacity -
don’t chase the fastest charging speed a car supports unless you really need it.
How do you know if you really need it?
Well, do I have a video for you!
It’s… it’s this one.
♫ Music ♫
With that, we need to start with the basics,
and I mean the really basic core tenet of everything: energy.
How much energy does an electric car use?
How much can it store in its battery pack?
How far will that take you?
And how long does it take to replenish that used energy?
For a while I was struggling with how to begin answering these questions -
electric vehicles require different thinking than what you might be used to and as we go on you’ll see why.
But, well I kinda forgot that we can in fact translate most concepts from a combustion vehicle to an EV.
Since more of you are familiar with those than EVs, let’s start with this:
the battery pack is the new gas tank, and the kilowatt-hour is the new gallon.
An electric car’s battery pack doesn’t have a capacity in gallons, of course, but it does have a capacity.
Rather than giving that capacity in volume of a liquid chemical concoction,
we define its capacity in raw energy terms.
Energy. It makes the world go ‘round!
But what is it really?
This section is going to feel like we’re deep in the weeds but it’s fundamental to understanding how charging works.
First, you need to understand the difference between power and energy.
This trips a lot of folks up because it’s a bit confusing.
You probably have a general sense of how much power things in your life use,
for instance light bulbs are given a wattage.
The watt, though, is a unit of instantaneous power, not energy.
Quantifying energy from power requires a time component,
and in the realm of electricity we use the watt-hour.
Watt-hours are what they sound like.
It’s simply the average power draw in watts that occurs over a period of one hour.
As an example, a 10 watt light bulb that has run for 1 hour will have consumed 10 watt-hours of energy.
When you change the power level, you change the speed at which energy is consumed.
A more powerful light bulb will burn through energy more quickly.
For instance a one hundred watt light bulb only needs to run for six minutes to have consumed the same 10 watt-hours
as our 10 watt bulb does over an hour.
It uses 10 times as much power, so the same total energy use is reached in one tenth the time.
Watt-hours are pretty small, though, so when talking about electrical energy
we usually use the kilowatt-hour - which is just one thousand watt-hours.
Your electric utility probably bills you in this unit.
And the battery pack capacity of an electric car is given in kilowatt-hours.
Battery-electric vehicles on the market today (meaning those which are purely electric, not hybrid powertrains)
usually have battery packs of at least 30 kilowatt-hours, though 50+ is more typical in the US market.
Many models are available with different pack sizes to choose from,
for instance my car - a Hyundai Ioniq 5 - can be had with either a 58 kWh pack in its base configuration,
or a 77.4 kWh pack, the size I have.
Of note, right now, car manufacturers tend to be a little vague
on whether the figure they give their battery packs is the pack’s actual capacity or a usable capacity.
See, to prolong battery life most cars only give you access to a certain range of the pack’s charge levels.
It puts more wear and tear on a battery cell when you push it to its extremes,
so somewhat typical is for a 100% indicated charge to really be something like a 95% charge,
and when the battery is “dead” at an indicated 0%, it’s really more like 5% charged still.
To be clear, this is a good practice!
But I wish every manufacturer would give distinct gross and usable capacity metrics for their battery packs
so we can understand how much they’re pushing the cells.
For what it’s worth, many EVs will let you be gentler on their batteries by allowing you to set a maximum charge level.
I have my car set to stop charging at 80% because honestly it has way more range than I need,
and limiting charge levels is thought to prolong battery pack life.
Anyway, let’s go back to what I said earlier.
The battery pack is the new gas tank, and the kilowatt-hour is the new gallon.
So, my car’s “tank” holds 77.4 kWh.
And how many miles can each of those 77.4 kWh take me?
On the highway, about three.
This car, like lots out there, actually gives you efficiency in miles per kilowatt-hour,
and just like miles per gallon, a higher number is better.
Some cars will flip that and tell you how many watt-hours you consume to go a mile,
but I find distance-driven per kilowatt-hour to be much more human-friendly,
especially since I pay for electricity in that unit.
How far can a full “tank” take me, then?
It’s the same math as a combustion vehicle, just with different units.
3 (our distance we can go with a kWh of energy)
multiplied by 77.4 (how many of those kWh our pack holds)
gives about 232 miles of range, a bit shy of the 256 miles my car is rated by the EPA to go.
That’s because the EPA rating includes mixed driving, and in the realm of EVs,
highway driving is less efficient than stop-and-go.
I’ll explain why later, but for instance around town I’m regularly hitting 4 miles per kWh in this car,
but at sustained highway speeds that just isn’t possible.
Heh, right, speaking of the EPA,
some knucklehead thought that MPGe was a good idea.
If you look at the window sticker of an electric car it’s gonna be prominently given a fuel efficiency in
Miles Per Gallon-gasoline Equivalent.
[exasperatedly] Here’s how that works:
we assume a US gallon of gasoline contains 33.7 kWh of energy.
Then, based on the actual energy consumption of the vehicle in real units,
a backhanded calculation is done to give you Miles per Pretend Gallon.
I... it’s not exactly meaningless,
it’s nice to see how much farther an EV will take you with the same amount of energy.
But nobody buys electricity by the gallon, so miles per kilowatt-hour makes way more sense.
That would be too easy, though, so if you want to use real units
the EPA gives them to you, but they tell you how many kWh of electricity the car needs to go 100 miles.
Look, playing around with different energy units is fun and you can do it however you like,
but MPGe is just a wee bit silly, dontcha think?
Anyway, that’s the basics.
Electric cars have a battery capacity in kWh,
and we measure a car’s driving efficiency in much the same way as miles per gallon.
And that efficiency multiplied by the pack’s capacity gives you its driving range.
If you’d like to get an idea of how much it will cost to charge your electric car,
well again the basic math is the same as with a gas-powered car, just with different units.
Take your commute distance and divide by your car’s efficiency.
I’ll do a 40 mile commute as an example, and divide by my car’s 3 mi/kWh highway efficiency.
I should expect an all-highway 40 mile commute to need 13.3 kWh.
Now it’s a simple matter of determining how much your electric utility charges per kWh.
Supposing a cost of $0.15/kWh, that commute will cost $2.00.
Now I’ve ignored charging losses with this calculation; adding 10% will give a more accurate cost.
Public charging tends to be more expensive, but we’ll get to that in a bit.
♫ Music ♫
I know the next thing a lot of you want to know is how long it takes to charge a car back up
and thus refill its proverbial tank.
The answer is actually so simple it only needs two words.
Are you ready?
Now, don’t worry, once you get your head around a few variables, you’ll be able to answer this quite confidently.
That’s literally my goal, here!
For now, we’re going to focus on “slow” AC charging.
If you have regular access to a "slow" charger which can fill your car up overnight (or perhaps when you’re at work),
you’ll never even think about visiting a charger when you’re out and about.
And one of the most beautiful things about the power grid is that it’s everywhere!
Level 1 and 2 AC charging simply connects a car to the grid in the same way you do anything else,
from a table lamp to a clothes dryer.
But I’m getting a little ahead of myself.
To answer how long it takes to charge, there’s really only one critical factor:
how much power you can deliver to the car.
We’ll get into details on how exactly that’s accomplished shortly,
but when you know how much power you have available and you know the size of your battery pack,
solving for time to fill it is really simple math.
All you do is take the battery pack size in kWh and divide it by the power supply in kilowatts
and there, you’ve solved for hours!
Here’s an example for determining charging time.
Say you have a car with a 60 kWh battery pack, and a charger which can supply 5 kilowatts.
60 divided by 5 is 12, so that car would need 12 hours to charge from empty to full
with a 5 kW charger.
But if you had twice the power, 10 kW, the charging time would be cut in half to six hours.
60 kilowatt-hours divided by 10 kilowatts is 6 hours.
And if you only had 3 kW to play with, charging time would be stretched to 20 hours using the same math.
But it’s important to keep in mind that charging time also depends on how charged the battery already is.
A half-full battery… is already half-full!
So in our 60 kWh example car, a 50% charge means only 30 kWh actually needs to be fed to it.
That cuts all those charging times in half.
This is because on AC charging, since the battery pack is so large and the power input is relatively low,
the charging curve is essentially linear.
We’re not dealing with the effects you might be used to with a phone or laptop battery.
What really matters is how much energy was taken out of the battery, and how much power we have to refill it.
Again, this is in the case of AC charging.
DC fast charging is another story, which we’ll get to later.
Now, manufacturers will give you a required charging time for their cars.
But honestly, you should probably just ignore that.
See, if you were to look at Hyundai’s information on my car,
they’ll tell you that it takes a little less than 7 hours to charge it from 10% to 100% on a 240V charger.
That’s pretty good for an up-to 300 mile EV.
But, I don’t like that answer.
At all.
To be clear it’s not wrong - that speed is absolutely possible!
But only if you have a charger with enough capacity to support that speed.
Which I don’t because, frankly, I think it’s very much overkill for virtually anyone.
But again, getting ahead of myself here.
A while back I made a video on what exactly an EVSE - the technical name for a car charger -
is, does, and how it works.
I won’t get into the specifics here, if you’re curious watch that video!
But the key thing to know is that the actual charger,
meaning the device that takes AC power from the grid and converts it to DC for charging the battery cells,
lives in the car.
The voltage conversion and all that stuff is entirely the car’s job.
The EVSE is just a very-slightly-smart power cord
which delivers raw AC voltage to the charge port and tells the car how much power it’s allowed to pull.
That’s all this does, plus a few safety things.
Hyundai’s charging time claim comes from the fact that the Ioniq 5’s onboard charger can accept a maximum of 48 amps,
and at 240 volts that’s 11.5 kW.
77.4 kW-hours divided by the car’s maximum power input of 11.5 kW
tells us that we need 6.73 hours of charging time to deliver an entire battery pack’s worth of energy,
exactly what Hyundai claims.
Now, hang on, they claimed that time from 10 to 100%,
and we did the math for 0 to 100% - why the discrepancy?
Well, there is about a 10% loss when charging a battery,
in other words only about 90 of every 100 kWh pulled by the car ends up stored in the battery.
The rest is lost as heat in chemical processes and various charging components.
But in the end, and this goes for any car,
all you need to know to determine charge time are three variables:
the size of your battery pack,
how much of its capacity you need to recover,
and how much power your charger can deliver.
Add 10% to the end result if you want to be really accurate.
Manufacturers are generally going to quote an empty-to-full time on the fastest charger the car will support -
that’s useful to know and is a simple selling point, but the real world is messier.
Usually in good ways!
♫ Music ♫
So now, let’s talk about what sort of charging solution you might need.
First, let me acknowledge that I know there are lots of you out there who need to drive a car
but don’t have a dedicated place to park and charge one.
Trust me, I’m not trying to be dismissive of your situation.
I’m just as frustrated as you are!
See, the beauty of AC charging is that it’s simple!
It’s incredibly straightforward infrastructure to deploy,
and there’s no reason it shouldn’t spread to multi-family dwellings and areas with on-street parking
other than finicky details like permitting, billing structures, maintenance concerns, building codes,
and miscellanea like that.
The good news is that there are plenty of creative solutions in the works and I’m sure we’ll see more of them with time.
So while I don’t have answers for you here, keep your eyes peeled.
For those lucky ones who have a garage or even a driveway close to their home or other electrified structure,
well you’re probably pretty good to go.
In fact you might already be set.
Actually, right, here’s a misconception I keep seeing pop up from time to time:
This connector design is waterproof — there’s a gasket in here which seals the pins from the elements when a connector is attached.
And charging your car outside is totally OK.
There is plenty of charging equipment meant to go outdoors,
so don’t assume you’ll need a covered parking spot.
You can simply install a charger on an outside wall near to where you park.
And plenty of cars these days can lock the connector to the car to keep bored teens from unplugging it while you sleep.
The other thing to mention is that in the US market,
this J1772 connector is an industry standard followed by all players...
except Tesla.
Tesla uses a proprietary charging connector, for better or worse.
I’m not going to relitigate this whole debacle as I’ve done it several times now with increasing levels of exasperated snark,
but you should know that throughout this video I’m assuming that you’re looking for a charger
that is directly compatible — no adapters needed — with literally every plug-in car sold since 2010
and literally every option on the market today except for those models made by That Company.
Even if you want a vehicle made by That Company,
I would suggest installing a J1772 charger as a simple adapter which is provided with their vehicles will allow you to plug into it.
And if you want one of the dozens of options that aren’t S, 3, X, or Y, you’ll charge in dongle-free bliss.
But there’s a good chance that you might not even need to install a charger at all.
♫ Music ♫
If you drive a fairly average amount, say up to 50 miles a day,
one of these little guys might actually take care of you just fine!
Level 1 charging is charging on 120V power,
and most of the time this involves simply plugging your car into a household outlet through a portable EVSE like this one,
which many vehicles come with.
Here in the US an EV can draw 12 amps through this sort of supply.
At 120V that’s 1.44 kilowatts.
That’s not a lot, but in a very efficient EV, 50 miles of highway driving might take as little as 12.5 kWh.
Assuming some losses that will take about 10 hours of charging to recover.
Now, that’s admittedly a long time.
But I’m willing to bet that you sleep for long enough to cover the bulk of your charging.
Level 1 charging isn’t for everyone and has drawbacks, but I would argue it’s more useful than many realize.
When I first got my 2013 Chevy Volt, which only had about a 40 mile electric range from its 10.5 kWh pack,
I just plugged it into a regular outlet.
Its small battery pack meant that it only ever took 10 hours for a complete charge.
And with a 32 mile round-trip commute, I was driving entirely on electricity every day.
My next job was nearly twice as far away at a 60 mile round-trip,
but by asking nicely and bringing a cord protector with me to keep folks from tripping on it,
I was also able to plug-in during my workday - again, to a bog standard outlet.
Usually I’d be topped off by the end of my shift, so even then I was doing an all-electric 60 mile commute
with only level 1 charging and a 40 mile range.
I would shortly move a little further from work,
proving that even a 70 mile commute was possible in the Volt with only Level 1 charging at both ends.
At least, for the seven or eight warm-enough months of the year....
OK, I spent too much time on this so here’s a condensed voiceover.
Level 1 charging is slow, and since cold weather decreases driving range, if you live in a cold climate a 40 mile commute might be cutting it close.
And I'm not gonna pretend everyone can plug in at work.
I just wanted to give you an example of its potential.
L1 charging is also less energy efficient since the car’s charging electronics need their own power to operate,
and with only 1.4 kW controls and monitoring start to take up a larger percentage of the power available to the car.
That effect can also be problematic if you park outside and the car needs some power to heat its battery pack,
leaving little power for actual charging - but that’s very model and circumstance dependent.
Plugging into a standard outlet may also present problems depending on what else is on the same circuit.
That is especially notable in older homes.
And, a 12 amp load on a normal socket is kind of a lot, and old, worn-out receptacles present a hazard.
That’s easy to fix by replacing the receptacle, but you should be aware of that.
And in case you’re watching from one of those 240V countries where boiling a liter of water takes 2 minutes in a kettle,
you should definitely not rule out charging off a standard outlet because you have more zippy zappy to play with.
The last main drawback of Level 1 charging is that,
since you need your car to be charging essentially whenever it can,
you won’t be able to take advantage of time-of-use rates if your utility offers them.
Since my power is a lot cheaper at night, I benefit from having a more powerful supply to my car.
So I have one, and the car is programmed to wait to charge until midnight, a feature nearly all EVs offer.
My more powerful charger is a 240V charger, so it’s classified as
LEVEL TWO.
Now, an annoying thing about the classification “Level 2” is that it can be anything from 2.5 all the way up to 19.2 kW.
That’s all
LEVEL TWO
so as a category it’s just not that useful.
It’s another reason I don’t like Hyundai saying it takes 7 hours on “a 240V charger” to charge my car.
And wait ‘till we get to the fact that sometimes 240 is 208.
Anyway, let’s say you need or want a Level 2 charger installed.
What’s that gonna look like?
Here comes that 2-word answer again:
it depends.
♫ Music ♫
First thing I want to say — if you are building a home or buying new construction,
even if you don’t have an electric car right now,
ask to have one of these installed in your garage.
This is a NEMA 14-50 receptacle, and it supplies enough power to charge virtually any EV from empty to full overnight.
Many inexpensive car chargers are out there which plug straight into this nasty fella
and it’s sort-of becoming an unofficial standard EV charging plug over here.
To clear up a sort-of mistake of mine,
in my video on EVSEs I suggested a NEMA 6-50 which doesn’t have the fourth, neutral pin.
See, I had already bought a charger from Costco which featured a 6-50 plug
and thought since an EVSE doesn’t need the neutral that's probably what most EVSEs are gonna plug into
but nope!
There are way more options for 14-50 plugs out there,
possibly because big RVs use that plug so it’s fairly common at campsites.
But moving on…
Here’s another fun angle, do you have an electric clothes dryer and is it close to where you charge your car?
If you have a conventional electric dryer, and it’s in or near to your garage,
you already have a 30A 240V circuit at your disposal.
And inexpensive chargers are available which’ll plug right into it.
A 30A circuit won’t give you the fastest charge out there,
but it’s over 5 kilowatts which is, trust me, plenty.
Now, don’t worry, you don’t need to keep unplugging and replugging your dryer every laundry day.
There are simple splitters on the market designed to let you have both an EVSE and a dryer plugged into the same receptacle,
but you will have to remember to unplug your car before you use the dryer should you go that route.
Really, though, if you have this option - take it!
But if you’re not in that lucky boat,
to add a charger to your existing home you’ll need a new circuit run from your electrical panel to wherever you charge your car.
If your panel is in or near your garage, this will be a cinch and should only cost you a few hundred dollars.
If it’s farther away, expect to pay more.
Since Level 2 chargers are 240/208V and require both hot legs you will need two free spaces in your breaker panel.
If you currently have none, you may be able to consolidate some circuits together -
consult your electrician for whether or not that’s possible or allowed where you live.
Oh, and definitely don’t assume you need an electrical service upgrade to drive electric -
I would argue you almost certainly don’t.
There are also some pretty exciting developments when it comes to breaker panels which will come up in a future video.
But assuming you do have the space for a new breaker in your service panel,
well here’s broadly what’s gonna happen.
A new two-pole circuit breaker will take up two spots in the panel,
and a two-conductor with ground cable will be connected with the hot wires to the breaker’s lugs,
and the ground to your ground block.
That cable will then exit the panel and run through walls, attics, or whenever code allows
until it gets to where you want your charger.
If you’re hardwiring a charger, you’ll stick a junction box on the wall where that cable ends up,
pull the wires into the box and connect them through to an EVSE’s incoming power wires.
If you’re installing a high-power receptacle, it’s much the same idea.
Close up the panel and box,
close in the breaker and energize the wires,
and you’re done.
This is a really straightforward process, so much so that I’ve done it myself two times now:
once for my parents, and later for me.
DIYing it’s not for everyone, and different chargers may need different things -
for instance, really big EVSEs actually need a disconnect switch as well.
But when it comes to electrical work this is really simple stuff,
and the simplicity here is one of many reasons I’m much more excited about EVs compared to, say, hydrogen.
And when you have a circuit like this available in your home,
you are seriously never going to think about charging.
You can have a full battery every day and the idea of stopping somewhere to get a top up will just leave your mind.
It’s truly amazing and I hope everyone who needs to drive can experience this.
♫ Music ♫
Assuming you have the option of running a new circuit,
well now comes the time when you’ll need to decide how large of a circuit you want to run.
And here I’d like to whip out my Midwesterner card and strongly convince you to not go overboard.
There are a lot of people who think that they’re gonna need a big honkin’ 50A circuit with expensive 6 gauge wiring to charge their car.
And I’ve seen multiple folks in two car families presume that they’ll need two of those very large and expensive circuits to drive electric.
Here’s my spicy take;
ya don’t.
The only scenario where you would actually need that much power
is if you and your partner *each* drive over two hundred miles every single day.
I’ve seen so many folks in comments, product reviews, and really wherever else online
get into this mindset that they want the fastest charger possible.
They’ll immediately start looking for massive high-power charging stations
and often seem to assume that if they were to buy a car which *can* charge at 10 kW, they'll need a 10 kW charger for it.
I mean, if you can swing it go ahead but that’s not how it works.
Any car will work on any charger and simply limit its power draw based on a capacity signal coming from the charger.
That’s how the standard works.
So don’t just rush out and buy the fastest charger for your car -
it’s expensive and may come with more headaches than you bargained for.
How do you know what sorta charger you actually need?
Simple, you just listen to me!
It’s 7.2 kW. That’ll do fine!
I’m kidding, but actually not really...
I consider that to be the “very good” speed that’ll work for just about anyone
but to give you some real information in the realm of electric vehicle supply equipment,
amps are what matters first and foremost.
Wires of a given thickness can only handle so much current,
ultimately making amps allowed on a circuit the limiting factor.
So when you look for a charger, you’re gonna find them listed by amperage.
Thanks to the 80% rule which limits continuous loads to 80% of a circuit’s capacity,
you’ll usually find two amperages listed: the size circuit a given unit requires, and the actual amperage it can deliver to a car.
Now, I know we’ve been talking in kilowatts and now I’m throwing amps at you.
Sorry about that.
To know the power output of a charger in kilowatts,
you simply multiply amps it can supply by the voltage of that supply.
That is usually gonna be 240V, but in some settings (mainly in large buildings which have three-phase power)
it might be 208V.
It’s a relatively small difference, so it’s not worth getting too hung up on,
but be prepared for the same charger in a home setting to be just a little bit slower in a commercial setting.
Here’s a chart of all the common circuit sizes and how much power that nets you.
To make comparisons to real life a little easier, we can use a cheat.
You will somewhat commonly see circuit capacities be given a “miles per hour” figure.
This is useful, but a little messy.
A “typical” vehicle will gain about 10 miles of range per hour on a 20 amp charger,
15 miles per hour on a 30 amp unit,
20 mph on a 40A unit,
and I’ll let you do the rest as homework.
Oh and Level 1 charging, remember that’s just plugging into a household outlet,
gives you about 4 miles of range per hour, maybe 5 with a really efficient EV in perfect conditions.
Using these miles-per-hour speeds is a decent starting point but now that bigger EVs are on the market,
it’s beginning to fall apart.
My car lines up with those figures pretty well at 3 miles per kilowatt-hour on the highway,
but of course in winter it needs a little more time since it uses more energy to go the same distance.
And a vehicle like an F-150 Lightning will, based on what the EPA says,
only gain about ⅔ as much range per hour it’s plugged in as the conventional speeds wisdom.
So I’d argue it’s better to think about this in energy terms, but giving a charger a speed like that is handy.
So handy, I’m gonna use it right now!
The next thing to do to help you determine how large of a charging circuit you might need
is to multiply that miles-per-hour figure by hours plugged into a charger
to get a sense of how many miles are regained in that time.
I’m gonna go ahead and work with a 10 hour overnight charge time since lots of you sleep for 8 hours
and a morning and evening routine tacks on a bit at each end.
If you’ve been following along then you’ll know a 20 amp circuit gets you 100 miles of range overnight,
30 amps gives you 150, 40 amps 200.
And again - I'll leave the rest for homework.
Notice how the smallest number I just gave you was 100 miles.
I’m going to stress this point. And I’m going to be obnoxious about this
because I really need y’all to know this and deeply:
A 20 amp circuit.
Which is not a whole lot.
And which can be run with cheap 12 gauge Romex,
can make even a crossover-sized EV like mine go 100 miles every single day, charging exclusively in the overnight hours.
You do not need a giant charger.
Yes, I hear you, what about all those "but sometimes!" situations you’re thinking of?
Like winter, for instance!
Well, even if we assume an extreme 40% winter range loss,
you’re still getting a 60 mile round trip commute recovered every evening.
And let’s be real, you can probably charge your car for a bit more than 10 hours every night if you really needed to.
Now I’m not saying everyone should limit themselves to 20 amp circuits for their car chargers.
I myself use a charger which is twice as powerful.
But I’m only doing that so I can drive 100 miles in a day (a thing I regularly do)
and top the battery up entirely during off-peak hours, taking advantage of low overnight power rates.
If I didn’t care about that, frankly my life would not change one bit if I were limited to a 3.8 kW charger.
Even my long drives would be recovered overnight,
but I might need to charge from 9:00PM to 7:00AM rather than midnight to 5:00 AM.
The reason I’m so passionate about spreading this gospel
is that I know there are lots of you with only 100A service or possibly even less
that have ruled out an EV because you’ve assumed you’ll need a service upgrade.
I’m not gonna tell you that you definitely won’t because I don’t know your particular situation,
but you should know that a car charging on a 20A circuit only pulls 16 amps.
That’s only 16% of your capacity if you have 100A service.
And yet, that can take you quite far.
A conservative 20,000 miles annually charging only 10 hours a day and only on work days.
It’s important to note that you can’t just add up the breakers in your panel to see how close you are to using up your service level.
In nearly all homes you’ll find the total circuits far and away exceed the main breaker’s rating.
You need to think through what’s on those circuits and how often they get used -
an electrician should be able to help you with that.
The other reason I’m pretty gung-ho about basic level 2 chargers is that the wiring needed for them is cheap and plentiful.
So long as your garage or driveway is close enough to the service panel that voltage drop doesn't become an issue,
this stuff is all you need and the going rate right now is about $80 for 50 feet.
And heck you can step up to the orange stuff, 10 gauge, and run a 30 amp circuit the same length for about $50 more.
And, uh, those of us who live where Romex isn’t legal can cry in a corner and hope that armored cable is up to code.
Anyway, before you get scared off thinking you need panel or service upgrades,
I’d encourage you to think long and hard about whether that’s truly necessary in your situation.
I can tell you from experience that a 20A charger on wiring like this
would have easily taken care of my 70 mile commute even in the dead of winter, and even with my crossover-sized vehicle.
If you have the wiggle room, though, I would personally suggest that you run a 40 amp circuit
for a 30 or 32 amp charger.
I consider 7.2 kW to be the Certified Midwestern Gold™ standard of charging.
You have to drive an awful lot and with a pretty inefficient vehicle for this to not meet your daily needs.
Over 10 hours, such a charger will push something like 65 kWh into a battery pack after losses,
which is about 200 miles in my car.
It’s the vast majority of the pack.
And even with a vehicle as large as a Ford F-150 Lightning, that’s 130 miles of range recovered every night, nothing to sneeze at.
To give you some sense of how Absolutely Fine™ I consider that charging speed,
well at home I do indeed have a 50 amp circuit going to this receptacle so I could charge at 9.6 kW,
but I only bought a 7.2 kW charger (because it was a lot cheaper) and I see absolutely no reason to upgrade.
Aha, but what if your household, through the magic of having two of them,
needs to charge up two cars?
What now, Toaster Boy?
Well, the first thing I’d like to point out is when you get your hands on a 200+ mile EV,
a funny thing happens.
You stop bothering to plug it in every day.
It begins to feel kinda silly never discharging the battery pack below 80%, so you just sorta…
end up behaving like you did back in the dino juice days and only plug it in when you really need to.
I guess I shouldn’t speak for everyone but honestly at this point I really only plug the car in after a long journey,
otherwise I'll go a solid week without charging it.
200 miles is a long distance, folks!
That’ll get you from Chicago all the way across Illinois and solidly into Iowa.
I really hope you’re not commuting like that.
So if you have to charge two cars, first don’t jump to the conclusion that you’ll need to run two circuits.
A single charger can easily be shared.
If you feel like that’s too hard or have some weird parking space restrictions or something like that,
well there are also options in which two EVSEs share a single circuit.
They talk to each other and split power between two cars if they’re both charging at the same time.
But trust me, the simple and free solution of just figuring out a system works pretty friggin great.
On Mondays, Carl parks on the left,
and on Tuesdays, Brenda does.
Alternate and then switch on the weekends.
You can do it, I believe in you!
And if one of you gets in the habit of backing in you might not even need to switch places!
Obviously if you’ve got a bigger family where more than two people drive cars,
this gets more complex and there may very well be value in having multiple charge points in your situation.
But think long and hard about how powerful those chargers actually need to be.
Remember, a 40 amp circuit can push 200 miles of range in a car over 10 hours.
Even if there are four drivers in your household,
your daily miles driven need to add up to over 200 miles before that power level really starts to limit you.
But we’re getting well into edge cases now, let’s reel it back in a bit.
At this point we’ve covered pretty much everything I think you need to know about AC charging.
Bottom line: Level 1 might work for you, so don’t rule it out right away.
But if you need more power, even a really basic Level 2 charger can take you places.
If you can swing a 7.2 kW charger, I think you’ll be happy no matter what you drive.
And going above that level might be necessary,
but really only if you drive a big vehicle very far every day.
Now let’s talk about DC fast charging!
♫ Music ♫
First, and I know I sound like a broken record,
DC fast charging should really only be necessary to enable long-distance travel.
I hope you can see why “slow” AC charging at home (or even at work if you have that option) is where it’s at -
it’s cheap infrastructure to set up, and it’s way more convenient to charge while you’re sleeping (or working).
Then you’re never actually waiting.
We just need to figure out ways for it to spread outside of the easy targets of single-family housing and the like.
I promise you that’s a much better future for all involved than turning today’s gas stations into fast charging stations.
We’ll need some of those in-town for getting folks out of a jam or for day trips and whatnot.
But DC charging should really be the exception and not the norm.
I’m not going to talk too too deeply about DC fast charging here
because I’ve made a video already on that tech.
Clicky thing, link below, you know the drill.
But that video didn’t touch much on the more persnickety details of today’s battery tech.
It was mainly about the chargers and how powerful they are.
Which, to be clear, they’re very powerful!
These chargers have an output in kW and we can do the same math we did for AC charging
to figure out charge times.
The quasi-standard 150 (!) kW chargers are fast enough to completely charge my car’s 77.4 kWh battery pack in 30 minutes,
and a 350 kW charger could do the same in only 13 minutes.
Except, they can’t.
Not because of the chargers but because of the batteries.
When DC fast charging, those effects you might be used to with a phone or a laptop are now in play.
Today’s battery chemistries can only be charged so quickly,
and how fast you can do that changes based on a number of factors,
most prominently how charged the battery currently is.
Right now it’s common for car manufacturers to give a 10% to 80% charge time.
My car manages that in 25 minutes at a 150 kW charger, and 18 on a 350 kW charger.
Beyond 80% state of charge, charging speed drops quite a lot because, for physics and chemistry reasons,
it becomes a lot harder to push electrons into the battery cells.
I’ve seen a few folks fixate on this and even view it as some sort of cheating or false advertising on the part of automakers but,
well here’s the thing.
You don’t actually need to top up every time you charge.
It’s a huge waste of your time to get that last 20% when there’s another charger 100 miles away.
Sure, you’ll end up needing to charge more frequently since you’ll effectively only be using 70% of your range between stops,
but in my car that’s still over 170 miles.
Stopping for a 20 minute charge after every two and a half hours of driving isn’t nearly as bad as you might think.
I legitimately quite enjoyed it,
though to be fair my car charges exceptionally quickly.
I’d be very surprised if just-as-fast-to-charge models don’t become the norm pretty quickly, though.
Many EVs will help you plan a route in their navigation software
which optimizes for the least time required at chargers based on their battery pack’s charging curve,
although you can also play around with apps such as A Better Route Planner if you’d like.
Or if, like me, you have a car which just…
doesn’t help with route planning.
I’m not too bummed by my car’s omission there, though,
because I fully expect DC fast charging stations along highway corridors to proliferate pretty quickly, and make that sort of planning ahead less necessary.
However, there is one thing my car doesn’t really do, at least not yet, that it absolutely needs to:
battery preconditioning.
Today’s battery chemistries are happiest within a certain temperature range.
Nearly every EV on the market - even the original Chevy Volt - has means to heat and cool the battery pack to keep it in its happy place.
But when DC fast charging, to get the fastest possible speeds the battery cells need to be pretty warm -
warmer than they otherwise need to be to drive.
And in the winter, if the battery isn’t warm enough DC fast charging may be…
not so fast.
At least, not at first. Once the car realizes it’s on a fast charger it’ll start heating the pack up as fast as it can,
but since the battery is so massive, that can take a while.
You could easily see a 20 to 30 minute increase in charging time when it’s cold out.
Certain EVs, notably Teslas and a few others as well, will start expending energy to warm up their battery packs
as you approach a DC fast charger.
This battery preconditioning allows them to accept maximum power, or close to it anyway, as soon as it’s plugged in.
This is an important feature that needs to roll out to all EVs, in my opinion.
Frankly I don’t care if it’s as fancy as Tesla's or Porsche’s implementation where it knows you’re headed to a fast charger because you’re navigating to one -
as a matter of fact I kinda don’t like that as someone who navigates with Waze using Android Auto.
I’d rather there just be a button I can press or a voice command I can give
when I’m 15 miles or so from the next charger.
But I do appreciate how the automated schemes would keep me from forgetting to do that.
With all this said, the biggest issue with DC fast charging today
is that we barely have enough chargers right now.
Already some popular corridors are experiencing charging queues, and this will get worse as more EVs are sold.
The good news of course is more EVs that are sold means there’s more demand for chargers,
but we’re in the midst of growing pains.
Like, for instance, charger reliability is a growing concern, and some network operators are less-than-great at operating their networks.
My personal belief is that a lot of this comes from the fact that DC fast charging technician is a very rare job title right now,
and with the current makeup of sparsely-spaced chargers,
getting to them when they need parts or repair is a chore.
I don’t mean to use this as an excuse, but it does make me fairly confident this will get better with time.
But let’s move on from DC fast charging
and finish up with some pointers on factors which affect your driving range.
♫ Music ♫
I’ve brought it up a few times already but if you live in a cold place, in winter driving range drops.
And I’d like to tell you it’s just a little bit, but unfortunately it can be significant.
I do want to stress again, though, that with today’s EVs,
so long as your commute is reasonable and you have access to a charger at home, these range losses are unlikely to impact your day to day needs.
They will extend charging time and cause you to spend a little more money on charging,
but when you are only driving an average of 40 or even 80 miles a day, it’s not a big deal.
Long distance driving does have some challenges, though.
You might want to ask, why does this cold-weather range loss happen?
Well, a huge part of the range loss comes from using the cabin heat.
In a combustion vehicle, the explodey machine under the hood is so bad at turning chemical energy into mechanical energy
that it ends up with all this waste heat it needs to get rid of.
There’s literal explosions happening over a thousand times per minute, and explosions are hot.
Dealing with that heat is what the car’s cooling system and radiator is for,
and by running a second circuit of engine coolant into the cabin and through a small radiator called the heater core,
the excess heat from the combustion can be used to keep you warm.
Since it would otherwise be wasted, it’s free heat.
Electric vehicles, though, don’t produce much waste heat at all.
This is cool! It’s why the world is excited about them,
they’re just much, much, much more energy-efficient.
But that means that when you want to warm the cabin, you have to take energy out of the battery pack.
And that leaves you with less for driving the car.
With an EV that has a resistive cabin heater, you’ll start to notice range dropping around mid-fall.
Basically as soon as you start needing to use the heater.
It will be pretty mild at first, but once you’re into the true winter months, you can expect about 30% range loss.
My family’s 2017 Chevy Bolt went from reliably hitting 230 miles of highway range in the summer down to between 160 and 170 from December to early March.
Using seat heaters more and cabin heat less can help,
but whenever you need to use your defroster you’re kinda stuck running the heat.
Unless of course you have one of those cool direct-heated windshields, a feature I think should be standard on EVs!
Speaking of features, one feature that’s finally spreading to more and more EVs is,
drumroll please,
HEAT PUMPS!
If you’re not familiar with this channel, I love heat pumps.
They’re the hottest cool things around.
By doing what essentially amounts to running an air conditioner backwards, you can collect and concentrate heat energy from outside and move it inside.
And since pretty much every EV out there has air conditioning,
making it reversible was an obvious next step.
I don't know why it took so long.
Doing this allows an EV to cut its energy consumption for cabin heat by up to 75%,
as moving heat takes a lot less energy compared to creating heat.
For the 2022 model year, Hyundai gave all-wheel-drive Ioniq 5 models a heat pump.
I’m hoping they make that standard soon because let me tell you, it makes a big difference.
I took delivery of my car in February so I haven’t yet experienced the worst of the worst winter conditions,
but from what I did get to see earlier in the year, a 15 to 20% winter range drop seems fairly typical.
When it gets extremely cold, the heat pump does need to be supplemented by a resistive heater so larger range drops are possible, though.
Oh, and I’d like to dissuade fears of running out of battery juice should you get stuck in traffic or worse stranded in a blizzard.
The car’s heater needs to work a lot harder when you’re in motion
because all that wind rushing against your car does a great job of sucking heat right out of it.
But when you’re slowed or stopped, that’s not happening. At least, not nearly as much.
In the Chevy Bolt you’ve seen some adventures in,
which doesn’t have a heat pump, I noticed that when stationary, even in subzero temperatures,
the car was only consuming between 1 and 2 kilowatts, with the occasional blip up to 3 kW, to keep the cabin and battery pack warm.
So, even with only one third battery charge, 20 kWh,
you could expect that car to keep you warm for at least 5 hours, probably more,
and you can easily stretch that just by turning the temperature down and bundling up.
Aside from winter, let’s talk about what other things affect your range.
Earlier I mentioned that highway driving is less efficient than stop-and-go.
Why is that?
Well, with all else being equal,
the single greatest factor to driving efficiency in an EV is your average speed.
See, as you go faster, your car has to work a lot harder to push itself through the air.
As a matter of fact, wind resistance and rolling resistance are essentially the only two things working to slow your car.
Both increase with vehicle speed, but the drag created by air is not a linear function -
as a matter of fact when calculating drag force, velocity is squared.
So the faster you go, the harder a motor needs to work to push your car the same distance,
and the effect gets worse as speed increases.
That’s not unique to EVs, of course.
The same goes for any vehicle.
But because the vehicle doesn’t use any energy when it’s not actively trying to push itself forward,
you don’t get the waste of an idling engine.
Even better, regenerative braking allows the car to get back most of the excess energy it used to accelerate from a stop
when you return to a stop or slow down.
Regen braking and zero idling waste make average vehicle speed essentially the only factor when it comes to energy efficiency.
That is of course until we talk about wind.
When you’re driving into a 10 mile an hour headwind,
the effect of the wind is exactly the same as if you were driving 10 miles an hour faster than you really are.
So wind conditions can rather drastically affect your driving range.
On the road trip I took with Aging Wheels, we started our journey driving right into a nasty headwind,
which reduced my car’s efficiency from my typical average of 3.2 miles per kWh down to 2.4 miles per kWh.
That was about a 25% increase in power consumption, and thus resulted in a 25% drop in range from what I was expecting.
In the end, this wasn’t a problem.
Our route planner was being so conservative that we actually hit the expected energy consumption almost exactly.
And, here’s the other thing to keep in mind, if we absolutely needed to stretch our driving range there’s a really easy way to do it:
just slow down.
Thanks to that head wind, we experienced a range similar to if we were driving perhaps 90 or 95 miles an hour,
even though we were really doing 70.
While it’s obviously annoying, dropping to 55 or 60 miles an hour would immediately have stretched our driving range considerably.
So if all else fails, just slow down.
Wind, average vehicle speed, and cold weather are definitely the three biggest factors that will impact your driving range.
But what surprised me the most when I started driving electric was the impact of wet roads.
Light to moderate rain doesn’t have too much of an effect, but when it’s raining heavily enough that water is pooling on road surfaces,
the extra drag created as your tires work to push it out of the way is much more substantial than I would have expected.
The absolute worst driving conditions when it comes to range are windy wintry days with slushy road surfaces.
Add enough snow to keep you using the defroster and you have a recipe for heavy range loss.
It’s for these reasons that I feel we need much more density in DC fast charging options along highway routes than we currently have
or are planning for.
50 miles apart is a decent target, and realistically even if I had a 75% range loss that would at least keep me on the road.
But since driving range can be less predictable than is ideal,
I hope to see far more DC charging options.
If we keep driving cars on long trips at the rate we do now,
we are eventually going to need as many charging stops along the highway routes as there are gas stations today.
So there’s a lot of work to be done, to be sure.
But perhaps my favorite thing about electric cars is the chicken-and-egg problem that normally comes with changing fuels is sidestepped.
Those of us with home charging can get an electric car right now.
It can take care of all of our daily needs and we don’t need to rely on public charging.
And now that those vehicles exist, there’s a market for DC fast charging on highway routes.
And when owners of today’s EVs sell them, less expensive options are on the market which encourages more adoption,
and that will increase pressures to install charging infrastructure at apartment complexes and other hard-to-serve areas.
There’s a lot of work to be done, and many would argue that electrifying cars is just trading one problem for another.
And to be honest, I’m increasingly upset with how car-centric our infrastructure and cities tend to be.
But frankly, right now I need a car.
And I’m not gonna poo poo harm reduction.
The fact is going electric is really quite easy once you understand the ins and outs.
If you can run a wire to use a dryer you can charge a car and go real far.
Now we just have to do it.
Thanks for watching.
♫ energetically smooth jazz ♫
Hey, I’m gonna be recording an unscripted video on my second channel
talking about some potential options for multi-family buildings and other finicky-to-serve places.
Clicky thing, link below, you know the drill.
How to choose the right one for your… *sigh*
didn’t get through the FIRST LINE!
Here we go.
What is happening?
What... what is that?
Oh, it’s velcro from the thing.
Got it.
Any car will work… eh,
Bah!
PEH!
PLEH!
BAH!
…with different pack sizes to chooge from.
Chooge?
But again, getting my getting a… getting myself ahead of here?
It puts a lot of wear and tear… oh no, I changed that on purpose you dingo!
I hope those of you who like That Company aren't too put off by my suggestion that folks install a J1772 charger.
It just seems to me that there's more value in the standard which benefits from industry cooperation
than the one made by a single, if currently dominant, player.
Don't like putting all me eggs in one basket, y'know.